Banner

by Joan McAlpine

Professor Tom Devine's To the Ends of the Earth: Scotland's Global Diaspora is one of the most important books written about Scotland in recent years. It debunks myths while at the same time demonstrating, through fact and statistic, that Scotland's mass migration was no fiction. The myth is that all migrants were victims, burned off their land. In fact, while the clearances were very real, many more migrants were positive, well qualified people, ambitious for a better life.

Scotland produced more migrants per head of population than almost any other country in Europe. We travelled further and continued leaving long after other restless natives had decided home was best. My own interpretation of Devine's book is the subject of my Scotsman column.

While the reasons for the exodus were complex, its scale and longevity destroys another myth ie that Scotland prospered under the union. Clearly all Scots didn't see it that way. Much of the profit made from our raw materials and heavy industry was invested elsewhere in the empire, meaning that the domestic economy didn't diversify. Wages in Scotland were lower that elsewhere in the UK and housing and health much worse. Our people were the raw material that never ran out. Literate, skilled, hard working - they were willing to administer the empire, fight for it, and supplement its labour force elsewhere in the UK as well as around the world. It seemed like the best option available. But a domestic market failed to develop because of the artificially low wages, and the flight of both capital and labour. It was a vicious cycle.

Continuing emigration, even when times were good such as after the Second World War, could be interpreted as an unconsious political act. Scots were frustrated in their own land, so sought fulfilment elsewhere. Now why might that be? One of the most striking facts uncovered by Devine was that Scotland, Ireland and Norway were the premier suppliers of emigrants from 19th century Europe. By the 20th century, Scotland had overtaken the other two, who by then had achieved political independence, and the optimism, self respect and confidence that accompanies such a change in status.

Recent political events suggest Scotland has changed utterly, and we recognise, at last, some of the forces that shaped us historically. We see more clearly what needs to be done to build a new Scotland here at home. Yet we also benefit from the shrinking of the world around which our people have been scattered. There is an upside to hundreds of years of saying goodbye - the 40 million of Scottish origin across the globe who want to reconnect. As people increasingly look to their roots for meaning and definition, Scotland, or more precisely Scottishness, emerges as a powerful force. There is also the phenomenon of affinity Scots: other migrants who have come to us from Ireland, Poland and Pakistan and find our identity inclusive enough to buy into and celebrate along with their own. The imagined community is real - and increasingly powerful. Diaspora isn't all about loss.

Prof Devine's book is available here on Amazon.

And here is a review of it by the Scottish Canadian academic Harry McGrath

Comments  

 
# UpSpake 2011-08-25 08:15
Nobody ever argued that Diaspora was about loss, did they ?. I have lived abroad a lot and the emigre Scots communities I have found have a profound love of their homeland, much more so than domestic Scots, in reality.
I am back home in Scotland as my wandering time is over. Now I wish to invest my time in my homeland for the greater good. This is also true of the diaspora who have no intention of returning home, anytime soon.
Change has been happening here that when it reaches a crescendo, will bring back to Scotland much more than people, it will bring investment and talent, not all of it physical.
Just waiting for the new administration to get it's act together, 100 days already gone and generations over the water - waiting !.
 
 
# Scottish republic 2011-08-25 12:21
100 days, most of which have been the summer recess.
 
 
# hiorta 2011-08-25 09:29
If it's as readable and informative - and entertaining - as Tim Pat Coogan's work on the Irish Diaspora, 'Wherever Green is Worn' it will be cheap at its price.

Both works have a common root, in mapping the effects of the barbarous attitudes of the largest tribe in the British Isles towards their smaller neighbours.
 
 
# ituna semea 2011-08-25 11:02
I think you may be disappointed Professor Devine is not as nationalistic as either Tim Pat Coogan or yourself.
Coogan's debunking of the de Valera myth however is very readable
 
 
# Scottish republic 2011-08-25 12:22
It sounds interesting.

I'll read it when I get time. I never seem to have any spare time these days.
 
 
# Ben Power 2011-08-26 13:25
We will hear more and more about Scots overseas. There are 40million of them and a majority have not forgotten that "home" is Scotland even if they never return or want to return.
A lot of Scots here have forgotten that those 40 million are Scots as well, through poor education of Scots history and culture.

The facts of the matter are that 40 million Scots descendants living outside Scotland are enough to make or break the 5+ million Scots living in Scotland. If the 40 million withdrew their Tourist dollars, Investment funds or international support Scotland would have much more to worry about than its southern neighbour.

Scots should embrace the 40 million and forget the silly scaremongers who sprout bunkum that they all would want to move back here. Most would not or could not for a variety of reasons. But some could without being a burden on Scotland and those would bring their investments in establishing themselves and their educations and productive abilities.

The majority emigrated because they had to. Clearances moved many. With others, a desire for their children and grandchildren to be free and healthy and not hungry could be described as “aspirational” by opportunists who pushed them out of the country, but pushed they were.

They did not relinquish their rights or their descendants’ rights to Scotland when they left, successive Westminster governments have whittled those away with resident Scots deferring to that.
The 40 million Scots outside Scotland are entitled to some form of representation in Scotland at least at a Scots Government level protecting their historic rights and furthering their ability to have meaningful links back home, not just to be treated like “plastic scots” good for tourist money and naught else.
 
 
# JRTomlin 2011-08-27 21:38
As part of the diaspora, I am often disheartened by the anger and resentment that is shown towards us by all too many Scots. If the Scottish diaspora were as embraced by Scotland as the Irish is by Ireland, I think it would go a long way towards increasing the worldwide support for Scotland. Fortunately many of the diaspora don't go home or read the Scottish coverage to run into the way we tend to be disparaged.

Not that I don't give my opinion anyway. :D
 
 
# Talorgan 2011-08-27 21:21
It would be good to have more contact with the Diaspora.
 

You must be logged-in in order to post a comment.

Banner
Banner

Donate to Newsnet Scotland

Latest Comments

Iain Clark Gallery