Banner

General

By Bob Duncan
 
Rangers will not be playing in the Scottish Premier League next season following an almost unanimous vote against the newco by SPL chairmen, which followed five hours of talks at Hampden.
 
Ten clubs voted against admitting Rangers, one club (Kilmarnock) abstained, and only the old Rangers voted for admission to the SPL.  The newco needed a majority of 8 to gain admission.

SPL chief executive Neil Doncaster earlier hinted the vote could be deferred amid fears over the financial consequences of the newco starting its new life in the Third Division, but clubs decided to take the meeting to a vote.

There is now uncertainty about who will replace Rangers in the SPL: First Division runners-up Dundee or Dunfermline, who were relegated last season from the SPL.

The reformed Ibrox club will now need to apply to play in the Scottish Football League then await a decision on which of the three divisions they will enter.  In addition, they still face a possible ban of one year from the Scottish Football Association.

In a statement, rival club Celtic said: "The decision to refuse access into the SPL was an overwhelming one and demonstrates the depth of feeling amongst everyone involved in Scottish football"

"Whilst the financial implications of today's vote for Celtic and for the Scottish game as a whole will be very significant, we have already stated that Celtic has a business plan and strategy independent of any other club.

"In addition, we will be working with our other fellow SPL clubs in the days and weeks ahead to take all possible steps to maximise commercial returns, which remain crucial in these economically-challenging circumstances."

SFL clubs met on Tuesday to discuss a proposal for Rangers to enter Division One, but the newco could begin next season in Division Three if the proposal does not gain the support of a majority of clubs.  11 out of the 30 clubs have already indicated opposition to a resurrected Rangers entering Division One, with a vote due to take place on 12 July.

Before the meeting, SPL chief executive Neil Doncaster said three options were available regarding where Rangers should play next season.

"The three viable options are effectively: bringing 'newco' Rangers back into the SPL with a range of appropriate sanctions; putting Rangers into the second tier of Scottish football; or Rangers going into the bottom of the pyramid into Division Three.

"The option that a lot of people have talked about, Rangers in the fourth tier, ultimately that would wreak huge financial damage on the whole game and it's difficult to see why 41 innocent clubs should pay the price for the misdeeds of one.

"There's lots of things that need to happen before that might take place.  The SFL clubs will be meeting again next Thursday and will be voting on that.  It remains to be seen how that plays out."

Warnings have been given over the last few days that up to half the SPL clubs could go into administration if the Ibrox club are in the bottom tier, as it appears that most, if not all, of the SPL's commercial contracts include exit clauses for sponsors and partners allowing them to pull out or renegotiate if the Old Firm are not present.
 
These clauses were added to contracts amid speculation that the Glasgow pair would move to England or into a European league, but they have proved costly after Rangers went into liquidation last month.

Green, whose Sevco firm bought the assets of Rangers for £5.5million, attended the meeting with chairman Malcolm Murray and manager Ally McCoist, who left before noon.
 
The decision was announced by email at around 2.20pm, with Green and Murray leaving shortly afterwards, while SPL clubs continued to talk.
 
Green claimed earlier this week he was confident chairmen would listen to his pleas, after he had met with several clubs to warn them of the financial implications.
 
Murray issued an "unreserved" apology on Tuesday in a move thought to be designed to pave the way for a U-turn.
 
But St Johnstone, St Mirren, Aberdeen, Hearts, Hibernian, Dundee United and Inverness had already declared their opposition while Motherwell announced on Tuesday night their fans had voted to reject the application.

Dundee say they "cannot vote" on Rangers' application to join the Scottish Football League due to a conflict of interest.  The club say no other Division One clubs have been told they are conflicted.

Dundee chief executive Scot Gardiner said: "The initial advice was that SFL rules clearly state that, save in extraordinary circumstances, all members must vote and cannot abstain, such action would incur a heavy fine and there was an existing precedent.

"Prior to the meeting [on Tuesday] however and following discussions with the SFL office bearers and their legal team, we were informed that these were extraordinary circumstances and there was indeed a clear conflict of interest and it would be against natural justice for us to vote.

"We could take part in the debate but not the vote. We were the only team in Division One told this as no other club was conflicted.

"Now that there is to be a formal vote on these matters at Hampden on 12 July, our technical position is clear. We do not have to abstain as we cannot vote due to the stated potential conflict of interest which would be against natural justice. This is not our choice, it is however a fact that we cannot vote.

"None of this means that we have been notified by the SPL, SFL or the Scottish FA that our status as an SFL club has changed or is due to change because we have not. We do hope however that this situation can be addressed as quickly as possible as it is clearly and obviously a tremendous distraction for all of us at Dundee FC with the season looming larger than ever."

Dunfermline, who were relegated from the SPL at the end of last season, believe they should replace Rangers in the top division and have asked the league for clarification on the issue.

Rangers have, with Celtic, dominated the SPL since the top league was formed as a financially-driven breakaway from the SFL in 1998, and Rangers, Celtic and the Old Firm matches between the Glasgow giants are the financial mainstays of the SPL's TV and sponsorship deals.

In a statement following the meeting at Hampden Park, the SPL said: "SPL clubs today voted overwhelmingly to reject the application from Rangers newco to join the SPL."

Several clubs in the SFL's three divisions have argued that on principle, any new club should apply to join the Third Division, and many fans, outraged at Rangers' failure to pay up to £140m of creditors, have strongly expressed that same view.

However, the SPL's chief executive, Neil Doncaster, has delivered dire warnings about the damage to Scottish football's finances if a Rangers club were to be three divisions below the SPL.  At an SFL meeting on Tuesday, Doncaster told clubs that the Sky and ESPN TV deals, worth £80m for five years from this coming season, depend on Old Firm matches, and sponsors also have the right to walk away if one of the Old Firm is not in the SPL.

Comments  

 
# tartanfever 2012-07-05 08:43
Rangers will not be playing in the Scottish Premier League next season

Blown it on the opening line. We all know that Rangers will not be playing next year as there will be no Rangers.

TheRangers, Newco or Sevco please - but not Rangers, they are just about to be liquidated.
 
 
# Jiggsbro 2012-07-05 09:15
Well said. And if the fans want New Rangers to inherit all the history and silverware of Old Rangers, then they ought to inherit all the debts and sanctions as well. Old Rangers thought they were above the law (of the land and of the game), New Rangers seem to have inherited that belief.
 
 
# hiorta 2012-07-05 13:49
Like.
 
 
# Dcanmore 2012-07-05 19:17
What I think is worrying for Sevco is they've only got 8 confirmed players on their books at the moment. They might not even be able to field a team in whatever league they end up in.

Decision day has now changed to Friday 13th... unlucky for some!
 
 
# markola 2012-07-05 08:50
Speaking as someone who was stopped on the way to school and asked "Celtic or Rangers" alongside "protestant or Catholic" I wish the whole sorry lot would go under and start from scratch with brand new armature clubs. But then given the choice between a football match or reading a good book (or any book) I'll read the book.
 
 
# Shagpile 2012-07-05 09:12
12 July, a date with fate. Oh the irony.

If newco is admitted to the SFL, within 5 years they will be hoovering up all the money in the Scottish game again. Even in the process of being liquidated they think they are calling the shots. A grudging apology through the gritted teeth is good enough?

I am working with an English football fan at the moment in Germany. He said well we won't get Rangers this and Celtic that on Sky anymore, we might actually see Scottish football for a change, that sounds more interesting. Honest money.

Let newco play in the Lowland league. It will keep the much needed reform door open.

Will Sky not broadcast St Mirren or Ross County in the Champions League if Newco is not there? I doubt it.

Here's another scare story MSM missed. It could cost the Scottish NHS millions in tattoo removals....

I wonder if Green will sue the SFA for 5.5 million over false assurances?
 
 
# bringiton 2012-07-05 11:20
The people in charge of money in Scottish football are saying openly that the SPL is only viable with the big two Glagow teams being part of it.The SPL should be known as the Celtic and Rangers football league.
This is a great opportunity to completely restructure the Scottish game and put the supporters back in charge.
There is no evidence that the money the big two have attracted has in any way raised the standard of football and indeed it could be argued that the effect has been to stifle development elsewhere.
Football needs to be taken out of the hands of the money men and returned to it's stakeholders the supporters.
The only way for any sort of meaningful reform to take place is for Rangers to be treated as any other club would be.
Bad news for the money men but good for sporting integrity.
 
 
# Training Day 2012-07-05 11:36
I'm sure the parallels between the MSM coverage of the Rangers FC (defunct) saga and their coverage of the growing SNP/independence 'threat' will not be lost on many:

- Scottish football is too wee and too poor to survive without Rangers; Scotland is too wee and too poor to survive without UK/London
- The overwhelming majority of fans see the sense in keeping Rangers as viable as possible; the overwhleming majority of Scots want to keep the Union
- the sky will fall in and there will be 'social unrest' (cf Stewart Regan) if there is no Rangers FC; the sky will fall in if the SNP is elected (2007) or if Scotland regains her independence
- anyone who argues that Rangers are unnecessary in the Scottish game is an internet bampot'; anyone who argues for Scottish independence is an unhinged cybernat

..and on it goes. At every turn in the Rangers saga the MSM have shown themselves to be spectacularly, hopelessly wrong, and very often cynically mendacious. Could it be that.. surely not?
 
 
# Mad Jock McMad 2012-07-05 12:15
The BBC are running another 'Rangers' scare story from the 'SFA' spokesman .... it is clear the SFA and BBc Scotland just are not listening as they continue to peddle their 'Puff'

www.bbc.co.uk/.../18719894

11 SFL clubs have already stated they will vote against the Div 1 parachute plan (not mentioned in the BBC Scotland piece) - four more join them and Sevco's side will be looking at SFL3 unless the SFL decide to take umbrage and invite Brora Rangers or Spartans to join instead
 
 
# tartanfever 2012-07-05 13:55
And to add insult to injury MJM, the rulebook has just been thrown out the window.

Any club wishing to join the SFL needs the support of 75% of the clubs, or 23 out of the 30 to vote in favour of the application. That means that 7 saying no will carry the day.

We already knew last week that 8 SFL clubs would say no (now increased to 11) so what did the SFL do ? - They changed the voting structure so that a simple majority would suffice. Now the vote of 16 clubs will carry the day.

Not only that, but the newco application to the SFL shouldn't even be considered as a club has to name it's financial backers (Green has not done this yet), it has to show financial prudence and stability plus three years of accounts to even be considered for membership.

This is what is not being reported by the Rangers loving BBC.
 
 
# 1876 2012-07-05 12:17
Rangers will always be Rangers!.....Just like Woolworths will always be woolworths!....In saying that,good luck to all genuine fans of the old club,I hope this mess gets sorted soon.I look forward to the banter when the newco visit Firhill either this season or further down the line.
 
 
# Chateaulait 57 2012-07-05 15:26
You must be joking 1876, in my experience of the old firm visiting Firhill Banter = Bile, one of the pleasures of not being in the SPL was that we didn't have to rub shoulders with the old firm.

No to Greens new club in any SFL division.
 
 
# daveniz 2012-07-05 12:20
I want to see rangers in division 1 but only if the spl changes to 20 teams and division 1 to 22 teams and a conference type league with Spartans, Irvine meadow etc. to replace teams relegated from division 1! NO! then division 3 it is then that's only if division 3 don't vote against rangers for trying to jump in front of them as a new company!
 
 
# farrochie 2012-07-05 15:52
Just follow the rules.

1. Rangers are in administration, about to be liqudated. Rangers will not exist as a football team or club.

2. In spite of trying to assume the persona of Rangers, Sevco have been refused entry to the SPL; there are no grounds for allowing a new club into the SPL.

3. There is no rule to allow a new club directly into SFL Div 1.

4. Clubs who meet certain criteria are allowed to apply for a place in Div 3 if a vacancy becomes available.

The above are the simple rules.

Sevco do not currently meet the criteria for entry to Div 3 as they cannot present 3 years of accounts with their application.

The SPL will need to manage for a year with 11 teams.

The teams in the SFL have their fixture list already and are all preparing for these games.

No need for further disruption to allow in a club of uncertain finance status, uncertain stadium ownership and without an established team. Only grief will come from further rule bending to accommodate Sevco.
 
 
# Seagetagrip 2012-07-05 17:02
I asked a southside Glasgow plumber last november just what was going to happen to his team Rangers given that they owed so much money to HMRC if they lost the tax case.
He said that what would happen was that Rangers would go into administration before Christmas and would emerge, eventually with no debt. As a small business man he must have been aware of the effect on other small creditors. He is a good man and I have known him for many years. The solvency solution, however, did not seem to bother him. Was this the talk then in the southside bowling clubs?
 
 
# parsonrussell 2012-07-05 17:25
Most real Rangers fans have been prefering the 3rd division option for a while now. We have been expelled (quite rightly) from the SPL because sporting integrity had to be protected. Thata same sporting integrity cannot be thrown out of the window now, morally the 3rd division is the proper option. My club has imploded, died and has to be allowed to be reborn, the state of other clubs finances are not my concern, no-one has shown Rangers any sympathy throughout this whole sorry affair, why should we now have the whole of Scottish Footballs financial woes put on our shoulders. We don't want anyone to be able to cast anything up other than what has already transpired under the past 2 regimes, we demand to be allowed to start from scratch in the 3rd division.
 
 
# Shagpile 2012-07-05 17:46
Dead Rangers have more rights than Cove Rangers.....?

Green can move on with his newco in the Lowland League, gain the status to apply for inclusion in D3.

FIFA, ought to eject the SFA if they continue to be compliant in the corruption of our game. Coe must be wetting himself..... The only football on offer for Scots will be the Olympic kind.

Read this and weep:

www.bbc.co.uk/.../18727333

We're now being told to basically shut TF up as football fans.
 
 
# tartanfever 2012-07-05 17:49
"My club has imploded, died and has to be allowed to be reborn"

Sorry, there is no resuscitating something that is dead. Newco will be a completely new club - no history, no titles etc.

If you want to keep oldco Rangers, then keep the debts and pay them off !
 
 
# Mad Jock McMad 2012-07-05 18:44
Maybe Sevco should come back as 'Third Lanark'?

Those of us older supporters can remember just how supportive the 'Old Firm' and especially 'Rangers' were of their predicament.

Sorry '1876' and parsonrussel, what goes round comes round - SFL 3 has its precedence for fiscally failed sides making a come back but that will be with the agreement of the SFL and the SFL alone.

It is time for your pal at the SFA who said failure to keep Rangers in the league will cause 'social unrest' or his mate from the SPL misinforming on the current Sky contract, to hud thir wheesht.

Time for Sevco to eat humble pie and be glad with whatever is served up. With luck it will be 'Rangers is dead, long live Rangers' but it will not be by right or any form of legitimacy - so the fans of the new 'Rangers' club will just have to get their heads around that - respect will have to be earned on the pitch and by an end to the sectarianism, for which you are roundly despised across Scotland, on the terraces. Until you understand the extent you are despised for your behaviour as 'Rangers supporters' do not imagine you will face anything but mockery and distrust where ever you go.
 
 
# parsonrussell 2012-07-05 19:09
Quoting Mad Jock McMad:
you are despised for your behaviour as 'Rangers supporters'



A statement full of generalisation and bitterness. I, me personally have done nothing either as a Rangers fan, or a person to warrent anyone despising me. Hate the club I support if you want, I would expect no less. But it's not the bulk of Rangers fans that want to stay in the SPL or the 1st div, it's the money men.
 
 
# Seagetagrip 2012-07-05 19:52
I think the last two posts give us an opportunity to open up the debate.
Visiting a pub on the West Coast owned by a well known Ranger Supporter several years ago, I jokingly suggested to him that with the number of Catholics playing for Rangers did he no think that a chapel might be necessary in order that they might attend mass.
He replied that he had no difficulty with ROMAN Catholics( he managed to sound quite polite) It was the dirty wee Fenian B........ds he objected to.
Now this, understandably may have had something to do with the IRA which I can well understand.
But are we ever going to bury this sickness in our society and does it really have anything to do with football for heavens sake!
 
 
# Suomi 2012-07-05 20:12
I agree with PersonRussell.As a Celtic Fan,an SNP member,and supporter of Scottish Independence,I am concerned about the generalisations about the negative nature of Rangers fans on various blog sites.I dislike the display of union Jacks,and sectarionism,wh ich exists among some Rangers fans.However,I know many decent Rangers fans who are not like that.They were not responsible for the appalling decisions made by former Rangers management.

I can understand that the sins committed by those who were in charge of Rangers,means that the club needs to be punishred.However,I feel that the anger of fans should be directed on the right target.The issue is about how Scottish football can become more competative,and what is a realistic punishement.As a Celtic fan,I acknowledge that the old firms domination of the premier leaguehas has meant that the premier league has become predictable and boring.That is not the fault of Rangers and Celtic.The solution is a challenge to those who govern Scottish football.That solution,in my view,does not mean pushing Rangers down to the lowest level.I would argue that,while the company that manages Rangers has changed,the football club,its history,support ers,and ground,still exists.I am one Celtic fan who is not willing to gloat about the demise of a great Scottish club.

I am a Celtic fan,but I value every club that plays in the Scottish leagues.I value the contribution of many clubs,eg Aberdeen,Hibs,D undee Utd etc,to Scotlands contribution to the wonderful game.I also have empathy for the fans of any football club that is in financial difficulty.I still miss Third Lanark.

In spite of my Celtic bias over 40 years I can still recognise the valuable contribution of Rangers to Scottish football.I am not so much talking about the titles and cups won,more to do with excellent football teams,the contribution towards Scottish Success in European competitions,an d the provision of great players (eg Jim Baxter) to the Scottish international team.As a Celtic man,I just wish that this club will survive.My view is that they are all important,inclu ding Gretna and Third Lanark.
 
 
# Louperdowg 2012-07-05 20:45
...the premier league has become predictable and boring.That is not the fault of Rangers and Celtic.

Pull the other one, Jock.

Any decent player with an SPL club gets snapped up by the Ugly Sisters and is never seen again.

The result is that the big two get bigger and the wee teams get weaker.

Throw in a wee bit of West Coast bias with the refereeing and you end up with a distorted league.
 
 
# Seagetagrip 2012-07-05 20:38
I too am a Celtic fan and was also brought up a Protestant.
At one time I followed my boyhood hero Ian MacMillan to Ibrox from Airdrionians.
However, as I realised the then sectarian leanings of Rangers I could not accept it.
It was quite easy to transfer allegiance to Celtic under the great Jock Stein, another, I believe, who shared my religious up bringing.
I believe that during the famous Argentinian Campaign under Ally McLeod a group of Scotland players refused to play in Chile at the ground where Pinochet carried out massacres of Republican opponents. I think the instigator of the protest played for Rangers? The Church of Rome came down on the side of Pinochet as did our old pal Maggie who idolised the man. Here endeth the lesson
 
 
# Clelland1 2012-07-06 22:22
Suomi your comments give me hope for SCOTLAND thank you Compton
 

You must be logged-in in order to post a comment.

Banner
Banner

Donate to Newsnet Scotland

Latest Comments