Banner

General

By a Newsnet reporter
 
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has called on US President Barack Obama to end what he described as a witch-hunt against the controversial whistleblowing organisation.
 
In a statement on Sunday, Mr Assange said: "The US must vow that it will not seek to prosecute our staff or our supporters."

He continued: "The US must pledge before the world that it will not prosecute journalists for shining a light on the secret crimes of the powerful."

Mr Assange was speaking from a balcony at the Ecuadorean Embassy in London where he has been granted political asylum in an attempt at evading extradition to Sweden to face allegations of sexual assault.  The Ecuadorean government has expressed concern that once in Sweden, Mr Assange may be handed over to the American authorities.

In a speech in front of the world’s media and hundreds of supporters, the controversial Australian also demanded the release of Bradley Manning, the U.S. soldier suspected of giving hundreds of thousands of pages of secret American government documents to Assange for publication on WikiLeaks.

Mr Manning has been held for over eight hundred days without trial in conditions described by a UN observer as cruel and inhuman.

According to his lawyer, David Coombs, for months after his arrest in May 2010, the soldier was held in a 6 foot by 8 foot cell for 23 or 24 hours a day.  When not sleeping, it is claimed that Mr Manning was banned from lying down, or even using a wall to support him.

Speaking from his safe haven, Mr Assange said: "Bradley Manning must be released.  If Bradley Manning did as he is accused, he is a hero, an example to all of us and one of the world's foremost political prisoners,"

He added: "As WikiLeaks stands under threat, so does the freedom of expression and the health of all our societies,

"The U.S. war on whistleblowers must end,"

Mr Assange has been living within the confines of the Ecuadorean Embassy since June after his appeal against extradition to Sweden was dismissed by a panel of judges.

Last week saw the situation escalate when the UK Government threatened to storm the embassy in order to seize Mr Assange.  The Ecuadorean government responded by stating such an act would be interpreted as hostile and immediately sought support from other Latin American states.

"Who do they think they're dealing with?" Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa asked during his weekly address. "They don't realise Latin America is free and sovereign.  We won't tolerate interference, colonialism of any kind."

In a statement this weekend, the Union of South American Nations warned that the UK faced "grave consequences" if it entered the Ecuadorean Embassy: "We warn the government of the United Kingdom that it will face grave consequences around the world if it directly breaches the territorial integrity of the Embassy of the Republic of Ecuador in London,"

UK Foreign Secretary William Hague has vowed not to allow Assange safe passage from the Embassy which has resulted in an expensive standoff with London Police Officers now employed in a round the clock monitoring of the building.

Comments  

 
# Hirta 2012-08-19 23:54
thesun.co.uk/.../...

Quote:
Foreign Secretary William Hague expresses moral outrage at the abuse of international law, yet he’s silent about the war crimes exposed by Assange.
 
 
# nchanter 2012-08-19 23:56
Was it not Hague's hero and mentor who entertained none other than Pinochet?. The fact he is foreign sec. is enough cause for a yes vote, I am told there is no cure for stupidity , listening to Hague I can believe it.
 
 
# Ben Power 2012-08-19 23:58
Seems to me that it would be a fairly simple and straightforward thing for the Swedish govt to give the assurance that Assange would definitely not be sent to USA if he ever went to Sweden to face charges there.
That they will not give that assurance under his particular circumstances is odd all by itself.
 
 
# J Wil 2012-08-20 02:57
But it's the typical situation where governments don't want to be dictated to. It's to do with their masculinity I think (to demonstrate that they have balls just like Hague). Anyway if the Swedish government went down the route of extradition now, they would be forever damned in the eyes of the public, but I would not trust them anyhow.
 
 
# Roll_On_2011 2012-08-20 00:50
OT - Breaking news

Salmond gets independence vote for teenagers in trade-off with Cameron:

scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/.../...

The Prime Minister may allow 16-year-olds and 17-year-olds to take part in the 2014 vote – and also let the Scottish Government set both the timing of the referendum and the wording of the question on the ballot papers.

Mr Cameron is said to be using the concessions as a bargaining chip to force the First Minister to restrict the ballot to a single question.

.
 
 
# Adrian B 2012-08-20 01:25
Thats very generous of Mr Cameron.

Unfortunately for Mr Cameron using these concessions as a bargaining chip to force the First minister to restrict the ballot to a single question.

Salmond will not say anything about this until the results of the Scottish Government consultation are published in the next few weeks.

Cameron has got nothing to offer Scots with regards to OUR Referendum. Salmond has always been very clear that nothing would be done before the Consultation results are published. He has also been equally clear that the decisions would be made in Scotland NOT dictated by Westminster.

You could bet your house that Salmond will not deviate from this plan.
 
 
# Leswil 2012-08-20 08:22
This is relatively easily solved,if the Ecuador government made a Assange a junior diplomat, he would then become covered by diplomatic immunity.

It is unforeseeable that the UK government would dare breach this long standing diplomatic arrangement.

The potential of breaking this would bring unintentional consequences for diplomats of all nations including those of the UK.

The UK has made a complete hash of this, resulting in probably all of the South American countries turning anti British and of course some are already.

Again, the consequences of this have obviously never been thought through.

Absolutely stupid action to have attempted, bluntly, to try and bully their way to getting what they want. Nothing new there then!

What bright spark suggested this?

All this is to appease America, when will they ever learn.
 
 
# UA02222 2012-08-20 09:41
It's not as easy as you make out. Even if Ecuador made Mr Assange a junior diplomat, in order to be covered by diplomatic immunity, accreditation would need to be sought from the UK government.
 
 
# brh206 2012-08-20 08:54
I have no idea if Julian Assange is innocent or guilty but the threats by the UK Government are unreal to be honest. It may or may not be the case that William Hague if operating at the request of the US Government but that is the impression that is being given to us the ordinary people. My advice to William Hague is leave well alone, if the UK Police storm that building then it will just be another nail in the Tory coffin.
 
 
# robbo 2012-08-20 17:30
Quoting brh206:
I have no idea if Julian Assange is innocent or guilty but the threats by the UK Government are unreal to be honest. It may or may not be the case that William Hague if operating at the request of the US Government but that is the impression that is being given to us the ordinary people. My advice to William Hague is leave well alone, if the UK Police storm that building then it will just be another nail in the Tory coffin.


There are no threats to storm the embassy. Ecuador are just trying to make us look bad because of the Falklands.

Is everyone completely naive these days?
 
 
# Roll_On_2011 2012-08-20 12:25
OT

You could not make this up even if you really, really, really tried.

Those good old honest, diligent and hardworking bankers are not at fault for miss-selling PPI and the Libor scandal, but Mr Joe Bloggs, their customers are! Had bank current account holders been charged for their account all along these events would not have happened.

dailymail.co.uk/.../...

Banks are plotting to use a parliamentary inquiry into their bad behaviour as a way of imposing account fees on customers.

MPs and peers on a commission set up to examine the recent Libor scandal will be approached by financial institutions this week which will argue in favour of introducing current account charges.

Several banks are expected to make the case that ‘free’ accounts were partly to blame for reckless actions by lenders and scandals such as the mis-selling of payment protection insurance.
 
 
# clootie 2012-08-20 12:32
What I have gained from this is how strong the Imperial vision of London remains. I think the recent re-kindling of the 19th. Century on TV has convinced them that they can send in the gun boats once again.
Retaining a "top seat" at the table for world leaders is a key objective.

After all we have nukes - shiver!!!!!:(
 
 
# J Wil 2012-08-20 14:03
I laughed when I heard about the Rear Admiral who, apparently, was unaware of the Scottish Government's inention to remove the nuclear weapons from the Clyde after independence. His response was, "..we wont go...".
 
 
# RJBH 2012-08-21 10:59
so dont you think then clootie that the Scottish Government should be putting some distance between ..Us and Them.
 
 
# gopher3 2012-08-20 15:33
To coin a well used phrase, "they just don't get it".
 

You must be logged-in in order to post a comment.

Banner
Banner

Donate to Newsnet Scotland

Latest Comments