Banner

General

By Lynda Williamson

The Japanese state-owned oil and gas company JOGMEC has announced that they have successfully extracted methane hydrate, known as 'ice gas', from marine sediments 300m beneath the seabed in the Nankai Trough approximately 80km off Japan's southern coast.

There is believed to be enough gas in this small test site to meet the country's needs for the next eleven years and the Japanese government hopes that the project will be commercially viable within 5 years.

On a wider scale, the state oil company said that: "Methane hydrates within Japan's territorial waters may well be able to supply the nation's natural gas needs for a century."

This breakthrough could be the answer to Japan's prayers as the country has seen its trade surplus rapidly slip following the closure of 52 of its 54 nuclear power plants after the Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011.  Since then it has had to use expensive imports of Liquid Natural Gas which has put its economy at a disadvantage.

The US Geological Survey estimates that methane hydrates deposits could contain twice as much carbon as all other fossil fuels on earth but warns that the ecological impact is "very poorly understood."

Methane hydrate is a naturally occurring form of methane gas combined with water which produces a crystalline substance containing very high concentrations of methane.  It is found extensively throughout the world, among other places in major river deltas such as the Amazon Delta as well as in ocean sediments and in the sediments in and beneath areas of permafrost.

Methane gas is approximately 20 times more potent as a greenhouse gas than CO2 so any leakage of methane into the atmosphere would raise global temperatures by considerably more than an equivalent amount of CO2.  Methane is faster acting and shorter lived than CO2, remaining in the earth's atmosphere for only 10 years as opposed to CO2 which remains for approximately 100 years.

Some climate scientists believe that methane played a major role in the Paleocene – Eocene thermal maximum which represents one of the most rapid and extreme warming events in geological history.  Core samples taken from old ocean sediment layers point to short periods of rapid warming of up 8 degrees centigrade on top of longer term rises of between 5 and 7 degrees centigrade.  The most likely cause of this rapid global warming over a short period is the release of methane into the atmosphere.

Temperature and pressure conditions determine methane hydrate stability so global warming can have the effect of releasing more naturally occurring methane into the air.  Some scientists have pointed to plumes of methane rising from the floor of the Arctic Ocean as evidence that increased global temperatures could trigger the release of large quantities of methane.

The worry is that positive feedback could lead to a tipping point, a kind of vicious circle where the release of methane raises temperatures and the raised temperatures stimulate methane release.  Professor Euan Nisbet from Royal Holloway, London, explains that:

"The Arctic is the fastest warming region on the planet, and has many methane sources that will increase as the temperature rises.  This is yet another serious concern: the warming will feed the warming."

Other scientists point to storms and fluctuations in weather systems, which could produce changes in ice coverage, as an explanation for Arctic gas plumes.

Speaking to Newsnet Scotland, Dr Richard Dixon, Director of Friends of the Earth Scotland said:

"The last thing we need is more fossil fuels.  It is deeply ironic that methane hydrates are becoming more accessible because of climate change, since burning them would set us on a course to truly disastrous climate change.  The planet cannot afford Japan or anyone else to extract gas from methane hydrate deposits."

Comments  

 
# Caadfael 2013-03-16 11:49
What Dixon chooses to ignore is that what we're talking about is clean energy.
These clathrates will emerge in one way or another due to climate change and it would be better by far to utilise this source, thereby decreasing the damaging effects of CH4 which is ~20 times more damaging to the atmosphere than CO2.
Therefore there would be a nett decrease in reliance purely on oil.
Harvested responsibly, both on and off-shore ... particularly off, would also prevent the recurrence of the Storegga and similar events ... see here :-
en.wikipedia.org/.../...
Methinks Dr.D. is looking through the wrong end of the telescope!
 
 
# snowthistle 2013-03-16 15:57
Is it "clean" energy? Not sure what you mean by that.
 
 
# jinglyjangly 2013-03-17 00:21
Last year there was a report that there was 300 years supply (for Scotland) of "Fire Ice" west of Shetland. Im not a climate change denier however the green lobby sound more and more like the bitter together campaign with there negativity claiming wow wow and
thrice wow for every new energy source.
Getting the Americans and Chinese to shut down their coal power stations would be better for the environment

would it not be better to be burning
fire ice based methane rather than coal
as if Global Warming is as bad as the greens suggest there is a danger that the
fire ice will melt anyway and the methane
will be released into the atmosphere anyway, better to use the energy is provides to replace Coal and Nuclear,
 
 
# snowthistle 2013-03-18 00:41
Think that while burning methane would be preferable to burning coal it would be better to invest in more renewables. It's not an either or choice.
Also, the fear is accidental release of pure methane into the atmosphere rather than the burning of methane. It seems ironic that the Japanese don't seem to have taken this into account.
 

You must be logged-in in order to post a comment.

Banner
Banner

Donate to Newsnet Scotland

Latest Comments