The baby and the bathwater

Tuesday, 12 July 2011 14:52
3 Comments
Print PDF

by Mark Irvine

While Gordon Brown rails against the past activities of certain newspapers in relation to his private life, the Sunday Times last weekend provided the perfect reason to avoid throwing out the baby with the bathwater when it comes to investigative journalism.

The Sunday Times, part of the News International stable of course, reported that five MPs have earned more that £200,000 since last year's general election, from outside interests and on top of their Westminster salaries.

Which means of course that they are all effectively part-time Members of Parliament whose outside interests are being subsidised by the public purse.

And since senior civil servants are not allowed to hold second or third jobs, why should the same rules not apply to MPs?  It simply would not be tolerated in the Scottish Parliament?

Gordon Brown actually tops the list having been paid £588,560 for giving speeeches, writing a book and serving as a 'global leader in residence' at New York University.  Good luck to him I say, but why doesn't he just resign his seat as a Fife MP and pursue these other business interests on a full-time basis?

Now Gordon Brown says that he doesn't benefit personally from these earnings, that they all go towards the 'Office of Gordon and Sarah Brown'.

But that's missing the point, deliberately perhaps, because no MP, not even Gordon Brown or anyone else, can possibly be in two places at one time.

Other high earners include Stephen Phillips - the Tory MP for Sleaford and North Hykeham who became a QC two years ago - and earned £331,190 for his legal work over the past year.

Several other notable Tories include Malcolm Rifkind (£212,939), Nicholas Soames (£208,769), Tony Baldry (£203,664) and John Redwood (£181,627).

Not far behind from the Labour party were former ministers David Blunkett (£180,480) and David Miliband (£158,980).

So well done the Sunday Times for showing that not all journalists are hackers, liars and criminals.

Many of them do a great job in exposing hypocrisy and bad behaviour - amongst the so called 'great and the good'.

 

Comments  

 
# UpSpake 2011-07-16 09:31
Perhaps it's because that 'career' politicians, such as Brown do not see their interests as being to serve theor constituents rather to serving themselves. The whole Westminster machine is geared to self egrandisment and structured around the holidays of public schools and their inherent timetables.
Those wot do have to leave London by mid-day Friday to get to their country estates, how can it be otherwise. Some of them have some distance to travel and they need to be 'home' for dinner.
The system/establishment is broken but very far from broke!.
Get voted out, no worries, the directorship awaits in a city institution which you have been lucky to have been advising all these years in politics and never mind, those buddy's remaining will be warming up a seat for you in the Lord's whereupon once the ermine is donned, a few more lucrative city directorships will materialise.
This is why so many Scots politicians once they enter Westminster tern their backs not only on their electors but also on their country. The revolving parcel of rogues. UDI anyone ?.
 
 
# Caadfael 2011-07-16 11:46
Both spot on!
Are there ANY honest politicians in wastemonster? I rather think not!
UDI? Yes! Closely followed by exiting the EU and joining EFTA with our own currency, be it Crowns or Merks, and our own Stockmarket.
That said, there'll be many "black ops" and other dirty tricks from the city, whitehall and wastemonster to beware of!
 
 
# enneffess 2011-07-16 16:44
My view is and has always been that MPs and MSPs must not be allowed work outside of parliament, with the exception of charity work.

They are paid to provide 100% to all of their constituents for starters, not have multiple jobs or writing columns for newspapers.
 

You must be logged-in in order to post a comment.

Donate to Newsnet Scotland

Banner

Latest Comments