Banner

By Dave Taylor

“The last referendum on Scottish independence was held in 1997”, the Mail on Sunday tells us, in reporting the results of the latest Angus Reid poll on independence.

With that level of reporting accuracy, it seems safe to wholly discount anything else they said. The poll itself, however, is interesting.

As always, when comparing polls over time, you need to look at changes in the numbers produced by the same company, as each one uses different sampling methods.

Normally, you also want to see the same question being used.  The form of the question is generally considered to matter – though the Electoral Commission analysis suggests that people are quite clear what the constitutional issue is all about.  Interestingly, those interviewed thought that “other people” might be influenced by the wording, but not them!

Angus Reid have sensibly changed to the actual referendum question and hopefully everyone else will too.

A month ago, when asked the “Do you agree” question, responses were Yes 32%, No 50%, Not Sure 16%.

On the new question, the latest poll shows Yes 32%, No 47%, Not Sure 20%.

While the movement is within the margin of error, if this shows anything it is that either the original question made no difference to the Yes vote, or that it did and real support for Yes has risen.  That more respondents who were previously in the No camp are now unsure will concern the No campaign.

Most commentators assume that the economic argument will have the greatest salience in deciding the final outcome.  In this poll, people were also asked: "Thinking of your own financial position, do you think independence will leave you better off, make no difference, or leave you worse off?"

In response, 14% said they would be better off, 38% worse off, 27% said it would make no difference and 21% said they were not sure.

That, I would suggest, will be the critical battleground.  The No campaign has a 'Better Together' theme, they are relying on people believing that things will be worse with independence, thus it could be argued that the 'No Difference' replies are more helpful to the Yes campaign.

There was one further question – “Which one of these political leaders do you trust more?”

However, only two politicians were given as options – Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon.

The option “Neither” was selected by 50%, 12% were “Not Sure”, 25% said Salmond and Sturgeon was trusted most by 13%.

I have to admit that the purpose of this question rather escapes me.  However, the figures may be hugely encouraging for the Cabinet.

In a June 2011 GB poll Ipsos-MORI found only “14% saying they trust politicians in general to tell the truth; 17%, say they trust government ministers. To make matters worse for politicians at all levels, more people say they trust journalists (19%) and bankers (29%) than politicians.”

For the two most senior members of the Scottish Government to have double the trust rating of Westminster Government is no small achievement.

Comments  

 
# cheesey 2013-02-05 09:48
Someone needs to poll why people are intending to vote No/Dont Know.

Then we'd have a strategy to work on those doubters.
 
 
# oldnat 2013-02-05 09:58
I'd be amazed if both campaigns aren't doing exactly that. They'll keep the results to themselves though.

Some idea of what they discover can be guessed as campaigns stress different things.
 
 
# Mei 2013-02-05 11:57
oldnat, Do you know why YouGov polls show Con, Lab, and Lib support so high and SNP support so low in Scotland?
 
 
# pmcrek 2013-02-05 14:02
Each company has a different way of weighting polls, demographics such as economic bracket etc.. so polls from different companies differ based on the methods used to weight the results.

Yougov in particular (amongst other metrics) use newspaper readership to weight their results (only about 1/4 of Scottish electorate actually read newspapers), Yougov also adjust the results based on Westminster voting at the last election, which can really distort the picture in Scotland.

Many times also "Scottish" polls are actually small Scottish samples extracted from larger UK wide surveys in an attempt to give a glimpse of the picture in Scotland, however the small samples have such a high error margin that its arguable they dont really tell us anything.

Here are some details from Yougov themselves about how they use newspaper readership and last UK election vote to weight results:

research.yougov.co.uk/.../q-a
 
 
# Marian 2013-02-05 09:58
The biggest problem the "NO" campaign has is that it is all based on lies and as we know you can only keep a lie going for as long as you can shield people from the truth.

The "NO" campaign would have collapsed long ago if it wasn't for the unqualified support of the BBC and MSM.

Truth is the greatest enemy of the unionists hence why they have tried all along to close down the debate on Independence.
 
 
# call me dave 2013-02-05 11:07
Why compare AS with NS?

The answer to the question is 50% said neither. What can that mean.
1. None of the two can be trusted by the
respondents OR
2. They are rated the same by respondents.


PS:
Keep noticing that in the last 3 weeks SG persons being interviewed do not mention 'Scottish' labour in their condemnation of any arguments anymore, preferring to strike at the Tory party.
Are they leaving a space for labour supporters to move across to the light.
 

You must be logged-in in order to post a comment.

Banner
Banner

Donate to Newsnet Scotland

Latest Comments