Banner

By Alex Orr

Much has been written of the benefit of being a large state in the European Union, especially in the ongoing debate over Scottish independence.  And it is naturally the big states that make the headlines in EU policy making.

This year has been no different on that front, from Germany’s austerity drive; to France’s intervention in Mali or Britain’s announcement of a likely referendum on its membership of the EU.

Reading the reports from last week’s EU budget summit, one could be forgiven for thinking it is only France, Germany and the UK (EU3) that really matter.  However, in foreign policy, the story behind the headline is increasingly the actions of the smaller states.

The European Council for Foreign Relations' (ECFR) European foreign policy scorecard tracks all the contributions - from EU institutions and the member states - that contribute to the impact of European foreign policy.

Amid a general trend which Scorecard 2013 shows towards member states co-operating on EU foreign policy a strong story also emerges on the role that smaller states can play in leading initiatives.

While leadership from the big three notably dropped last year, interesting coalitions of smaller member states were instrumental in developing and championing foreign policy initiatives.

Although Germany, closely followed by the UK and France, still came out on top in terms of the number of times they were classed as leading on a foreign policy issue in 2012, the Franco-German motor was barely in evidence on foreign policy development, and the gap between the EU3 and smaller states had closed.

As an example, the unusual alliance of Denmark and Ireland was critical in pressing for a collective EU position on labelling of products exported from Israeli settlements, with UK backing only coming once the idea had been launched.

Austria, Belgium, Estonia and Ireland were also critical leaders (alongside larger states such as Spain, Poland, Italy, France and Germany) in their contributions to Common Security and Defence Policy missions.

At the UN, EU support for an arms trade treaty was driven not only by France and the UK, but also by Belgium, Bulgaria, Finland, Ireland and Sweden.

The impact of smaller states in 2012 gives good reason to hope that over time the power that lies in the EU’s diversity can be used to the good of Europe’s global impact.

And that will hopefully see an independent Scotland play its full part as a force for good in the world.


Alex Orr is a Board Member of the European Movement

Comments  

 
# Alan 2013-02-16 17:59
"Cameron's" recent EU budget deal was won with the support of small countries (who according to Unionist logic have no influence) like Denmark and Sweden. Denmark even got a €134 million rebate (they don't have the Euro either).
 
 
# MacSenex 2013-02-16 19:35
At a meeting in the Danish Defence Ministry in 2008 I learned that Denmark has contributed to more NATO and UN approved military missions than any other state
 
 
# Legerwood 2013-02-16 20:05
There are 27 countries in the EU. The majority of these countries -14 - are small countries - that is they have populations of under 10 million. There are a couple of countries who have populations of just over 10 million.

Add Scot1and to that mix and you have a very clear majority of small countries who could pack quite a clout if they got together to safeguard their interests.
 
 
# cjmasta 2013-02-17 01:10
We know so little of what goes on in Europe in this country, why is that? Are we being kept in the dark just in case we get any ideas of wanting to represent ourselves with our neighbours? It must be said and repeated that Scotland will have much more powers at its disposal with indy in the EU, much more than Westminster would ever like us to have in the UK and we`d be making all decisions in our own interest. Not sidelined every time by Westminster.
 

You must be logged-in in order to post a comment.

Banner
Banner

Donate to Newsnet Scotland

Latest Comments