Banner

  By a Newsnet reporter

Details behind a pro-Union post advertised by the UK Treasury are being kept secret despite questions from an SNP MP.

SNP MP Mike Weir has asked UK Treasury Minister Danny Alexander a series of questions relating to staff costs and who will foot the bill for the £50,600 a year anti-independence fixed term role, but has received a two sentence reply.

The Scottish based post, advertised by the UK government department, will see the successful applicant paid £50,600 of public cash in order to promote what it claims are the "benefits" of the Union.

According to the job specification, the successful applicant will help produce: "analytical work on the benefits of the UK, in the run up to the proposed referendum on Scottish independence."

The post holder will work closely with London officials, UK Ministers and members of the London controlled Scotland Office in order to help the UK Government with its pro-Union message on the Scottish economy.

The role will become redundant in December 2014, immediately after the independence referendum.

The Scotland Office itself costs the Scottish taxpayer around £7 million per year, which is paid out of the Scottish block grant.  The costs to the Scottish taxpayer for temporary office staff for the organisation almost doubled under the last Labour Government.

In response to twelve parliamentary questions posed by Mr Weir, which included questions on costs and location related to the new temporary role, the Lib Dem Minister Danny Alexander gave a short answer in which he admitted the post had been created in order promote the Union in the run-up to the referendum.

However Mr Alexander refused to expand on the cost implications and who would foot the bill.

He said: “The Head of Scotland Analysis and Stakeholder Engagement role has been created to support UK Government Ministers in their objective of maintaining the UK, in the run up to the proposed referendum on Scottish independence.

“The post is being filled through a standard Treasury recruitment process for which normal civil service recruitment rules and subsequent terms and conditions apply.  Further detail on HM Treasury recruitment process can be found on the Department's website.”

However Mr Weir described his answer as “an evasive two sentence response”.

The post - Head of Scotland Analysis and Stakeholder Engagement - has already attracted criticism when, after the job description was published, the Treasury stipulated that it was NOT looking for a candidate that who can think professionally, manage resources, achieve results or appreciate people.

Commenting, SNP MP Mike Weir – who tabled the questions – said:

“Danny Alexander’s evasion of legitimate questions over how taxpayer’s money is being spent underlines the arrogance of the Tory/Lib Dem UK government.

“It raises the obvious question of what Westminster has to hide?

“While ignoring calls by the Scottish Government to bring forward capital investment and boost employment, the only job the Treasury is creating in Scotland is that of an anti-independence spin-doctor.

“The disastrous policies of the Tory/Lib Dem Treasury are a perfect illustration of exactly why Scotland needs to secure job-creating powers with independence.”


Mr Weir’s parliamentary questions are detailed below:

Mr Weir: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer:
(1) where his Department's office in Scotland is to be located; and at what cost; [120305]

(2) whether the Head of Scotland Analysis and Stakeholder Engagement role was created to fill competence gaps at the Scotland Office; [120273]

(3) whether any share of the salary for the Head of Scotland Analysis and Stakeholder Engagement will be met by the Scotland Office; [120274]

(4) what pension accompanies the post of Head of Scotland Analysis and Stakeholder Engagement; [120275]

(5) how many staff are employed in his Department's devolved countries unit; and what their responsibilities are; [120287]

(6) how many applications were received for the post of Head of Scotland Analysis and Stakeholder Engagement from (a)internal and (b) external applicants; [120288]

(7) which (a) Ministers, (b) special advisers and (c) officials were involved in devising the role of Head of Scotland Analysis and Stakeholder Engagement; [120289]

(8) which (a) Ministers, (b) special advisers and (c) officials were involved in the selection and interview process for the role of Head of Scotland Analysis and Stakeholder Engagement; [120290]

(9) whether the work of the Head of Scotland Analysis and Stakeholder Engagement will involve engagement with the Better Together Campaign; [120304]

(10) how many staff will be employed to support the Head of Scotland analysis and Stakeholder Engagement; [120306]

(11) how many staff employed within his Department's (a) Executive Management Board, (b) Ministerial and Communications Team, (c) Strategy, Planning and Budget Team, (d) Corporate Centre, (e) Treasury Legal Advisers Team, (f) International and EU Team, (g) Financial Stability Team, (h) Economics Team, (i) Financial Services, (j) Financial Regulation and Market Team,(k) Fiscal Team, (l) Business and International Tax Section, (m) Personal Tax, Welfare and Pensions Team, (n) Public Spending, (o) Enterprise and Growth Section, (p) Financial Management and Reporting Team and (q) Public Services Section are based at locations in Scotland; [120335]

(12) whether the post of Head of Scotland Analysis and Stakeholder Engagement is a politically neutral role. [120411]

Comments  

 
# Wee-Scamp 2012-09-17 22:05
I'm sure if someone in the Labour party asks her nicely the Scottish Information Commissioner will take Danny to court.
 
 
# Marga B 2012-09-17 22:14
OT but opened Labour Hame by mistake and found an article entitled "The socialist alternative to nationalism". It's by Unite - are they still Labour supporters then?

Also OT, the Catalan demo was highlighted last week as one of the 5 events of the week in the world, and Al Jazeera has just hosted an hour-long live programme on Catalan independence with excellent info, videos, charts, twitter debate, direct interviews with experts etc. Amazing! Can't they open up a Scottish office?

stream.aljazeera.com/.../...

Also Catalonia has leapfrogged the Stratfor Global Intelligence list of independentisab les to take second place behind Scotland!

Rounding up press review (sorry can't wait to post again), Catalan coverage of latest Scottish survey figures is headlined:

"Independence is the option preferred by Scots". Eat your heart out, Ms Bird!
 
 
# Robabody 2012-09-17 22:38
Scottish Labour and socialism Marga? Does not compute.

They used that "socialist not nationalist" line in the 70's to ensure the oil got snaffled. A bit of a case of new lamps for old, I would suggest.

Jack Bruce & co had it when they sang "I support the left but I'm leaning, leaning to the right" - name that tune. Clue: It's an old one just like the one the "Scottish" labour sirens are trying to sing.
 
 
# Edna Caine 2012-09-17 23:44
Robabody, very true about the "labour" sirens (though that's Disraeli Gears). Can't see Johann as Aphrodite, though?!

Let me complete the line -

I support the left, tho' I'm leanin' to the right
But I'm just not there when it's coming to a fight
 
 
# Barontorc 2012-09-18 00:05
Twelve distinctive questions, as far as I can see, and yet a two sentence waffle from Dizzy Alexander is meant to be the official response.

Contemptuous, or what?

PS/ MODs, or whoever is pulling NNS strings; whilst fully understanding your moderation needs, is it not time to drop this time penalty imposition?

NNS comment rate is dropping like a stone.
 
 
# cjmasta 2012-09-18 00:28
Even if NNS could place the time limit on each article instead of all of them so that you could place one comment on as many articles as you wish but can`t go straight back in, ach. What am I saying? Not everyone has a great deal of time to sit in front of the computer, many a time i`ve just read the comments to get the flavour of the article. The more comments the better I think!
Can`t wait till saturday in Edinburgh.
 
 
# DonaldMhor 2012-09-18 08:34
Quoting cjmasta:
Even if NNS could place the time limit on each article instead of all of them so that you could place one comment on as many articles as you wish but can`t go straight back in, ach. What am I saying? Not everyone has a great deal of time to sit in front of the computer, many a time i`ve just read the comments to get the flavour of the article. The more comments the better I think!
Can`t wait till saturday in Edinburgh.




Totally agree, I stopped commenting here because of that and the draconian moderation policy that makes the Beeb look fair and impartial. A waste of time. Read this while you can.
 
 
# Davy 2012-09-18 06:19
So they dont want to admit to wanting to hire a (back stabbing, two faced, lying spin-doctor shyster), and wanting us to pay for it. I dont understand why not ?? we are bound to believe everything that person says.
 
 
# Seagetagrip 2012-09-18 08:48
O/T

Just found BBC Scotlandshire. Best laugh I have had in ages. As my son would say "Pure dead brilliant!"
 
 
# Breeks 2012-09-18 09:29
This is appauling, but nothing new. Whenever I've had a grievance I wanted to pursue, (And in over 40 years I've had 4) I've found it common practice for public officials to ignore the meat and drink of your argument, and fire out a reply which addresses some peurile bit of trivia which they'll answer with alacrity as an 'answer' to your question, but the main thrust of your grievance is completely ignored.

If Scotland ever does develop a written constitution, I would have the personal aspiration that it should include the right to demand an answer to a legitimate question. This failure to answer questions, and do so with impunity, is the root cause of many, many injustices in our society.
 
 
# Alba4ever 2012-09-18 12:23
Talking of websites, take a look at the truly awful Better Together site. If this is the best the unionists can do, independence is in the bag!
 
 
# Leswil 2012-09-18 15:51
Yup, they create an anti Scottish post, and get Scots to pay for it!

NOW, THAT IS THE UNION!!
 
 
# Leswil 2012-09-18 16:16
OFF SUBJECT!

Here is a quote from the American Declaration of Independence, that has it right.
A brief comment from the the author who is part of the "Taipan" group of Financial ezines is at the bottom.

I never knew that there was an Independence movement in Arizona!

Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government.

-- American Declaration of Independence

Unlike the Revolutionary War, the Civil War, or the time of William Wallace, these actions are being undertaken peacefully. If they are successful, it's likely we'll see a wave of secession movements throughout the United States.
 
 
# graememcallan 2012-09-18 17:23
While you're at it, please explain the benefits of the Edinburgh tram system you forced through, against the wishes of the SG
 
 
# CharlieObrien 2012-09-19 16:50
I thought this idea of interfering was against international law? or is this their way of not obeying the law? Maybe I am being naive but should there not be somebody within the YES campaign with the ability to challenge this interference?
 
 
# SNP = Joke. 2012-09-20 21:24
Interesting how that this amazingly biased, pro-independence website publishes articles on how the treasury is advertising a "pro-union" job post but yet the SNP get away with basically appointing Nicola Sturgeon as the chief archtiect of Independence. Also, Big Salmond is not too good himself when it comes to revealing details, going to court to block the publication of details on Scotland position the EU if Independence was to go ahead. All he can tell the Scottish people is that Scotland has been in the EU for 40 years, which it hasn't and that he can guarantee that Scotland would NOT have to reply to join the EU, which EU commissioner Jose Barroso seems to have rejected last week by stating clearly that ALL new states have to go through the entire application process.
 
 
# brusque 2012-09-20 23:55
Quoting SNP = Joke.:
Interesting how that this amazingly biased, pro-independence website publishes articles on how the treasury is advertising a "pro-union" job post.


I'm really not sure what you mean when you say Scotland hasn't been in the EU for 40 years? and would be interested in hearing what you mean by that? Unless you are stating that Scotland has not been part of the UKs treaties etc since we joined the EU? That would only serve to underline that Scotland is under represented whilst the Parliament at Westminster makes decisions for Scotland.

This is a NEW post created specifically at an ADDITIONAL cost of £50,000 (which is the salary and doesn't include on-costs which have to be met) and I think every tax payer has the right to know how the appointment was made, and whether any pension rights etc. will be attached.

Nicola Sturgeon moved, sideways, from her post as Cabinet Minister for Health, this happens in almost all Businesses and services to make use of someone's special aptitudes - and no new post was created to enable her to move forward Independence. If you have information that the SNP Government have raised their current salary costs by as much as (let's say £50,000) then let us all in on it?

And I believe that the EU Minister stated categorically that his comments were specifically about Catelonia, and he was misrepresented by the BBC programme which stated that Scotlands position was not assured within the EU. In fact a representative of the EU said the very next day that an Independent Scotland would be an asset.

If you are at any time unsure of your facts, please just ask, everyone here will be happy to inform you:-) Welcome to the site, I hope you will take part in all the debate.
 

You must be logged-in in order to post a comment.

Banner
Banner

Donate to Newsnet Scotland

Latest Comments