By Angela Haggerty

Prime Minister David Cameron told an emergency House of Commons debate on the fragile situation in Syria on Thursday that the government must make a judgement call on whether to take military action against the regime of president Bashar al-Assad.

Mr Cameron admitted the government did not have conclusive proof that President Assad’s regime was behind an alleged chemical weapons attack last week but said it was “highly likely”.

MPs were called back early from their summer break for the debate although no decision will be taken today on whether MPs approve of military intervention.  Instead, the Prime Minister said time would be given for UN inspectors to complete investigations into the alleged chemical weapons attack which killed at least 300 people and left thousands requiring hospital treatment.

“Let’s not pretend there is one smoking piece of intelligence that can solve the whole problem,” said Mr Cameron, adding that the UK should be clear on its objectives.

“It’s not about taking sides in the conflict, it’s not about invading, it’s not about regime change or indeed working more closely with the opposition,” he went on.

“It’s about the large-scale use of chemical weapons and our response to a war crime – nothing else.”

While Mr Cameron insisted that the preferred option was intervention with UN backing, he said it wasn’t essential and that the case could still be made for action under international law.

When questioned on what President Assad’s regime had to gain by using chemical weapons, Mr Cameron admitted attributing a motive had been a difficult task but he believed the Syrian government was “testing boundaries” and the international response must be clear.

Labour party leader Ed Miliband did not oppose military action in principle but insisted the UN must be given time to deliver a clearer picture of what happened in the alleged chemical weapons incident and there should be a clear road-map to a decision.

Russia is opposed to military action and UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has called for patience.  The UN is expecting a report from inspectors in the country on Saturday. President Obama said in June that the use of chemical weapons was a “red line” for the US, although the West claims that last week’s incident was one of several such attacks in the country by Syrian forces.

However, President Assad has strongly denied that his regime was behind the attack, pointing the finger instead at Syrian rebels. He told a Russian publication that suggestions his forces were responsible for the attack were “contrary to basic logic” and said the accusations were “political”.

Civil war has ravaged the country and the UN estimates there have been at least 80,000 deaths.


2013-08-29 23:25

The USA, South Africa and Brazil manufacture the chemical weapon tear gas which has been used in Egypt, Bahrain and Turkey.
The US government knew that their then ally Saddam Husain intended to use chemical weapons against the Kurds and Iranians.
The British used chemical weapons against the Kurds during their occupation of Iraq in the 1920s…
Listening to some bulldog Brits you would think butter would not melt and the West has always been on the side of the angels. The manufacturer in S Africa is part own by a German company.
2013-08-30 00:02

So Cameron’s motion to have Britain intervene in the Syrian conflict is defeated in Westminster by 13 votes. Is this then one of those very rare occasions when the Scottish vote at Westminster actually saves Britain from itself?

YES Scotland.
2013-08-30 00:07

Thank God Cameron has been defeated.
This idiot is very very dangerous and the sooner Scotland is shot of him the better. By the way he is and will be our so called leader until we decide otherwise.
Hi Coalition….this is your leader and guiding light along with that visionary Tony Bliar who led us into the debacle which was Iraq.
I cannot believe we had even conteplated military action.
Surely diplomacy is preferable to violence.

You must be logged-in in order to post a comment.