By Sean Martin
 
The Scottish Conservatives have announced plans to scrap free prescriptions at their party conference in Edinburgh today.
 
Commencing and concluding her speech with appeals for a No vote in September’s referendum, party leader Ruth Davidson also called for education sector reform and declared her wholehearted backing of both the Westminster government’s approach to the welfare system and Chancellor George Osborne’s tax cuts.

But it was her plans for reforming the health sector which proved, as expected, the biggest announcement of the day.  Echoing her speech at the party conference two years ago, her first as leader, Davidson said she favoured an end to universal free prescriptions – which were introduced by the SNP government in 2011 – in order to fund the recruitment of an extra 1,000 nurses and midwives in the NHS.

Under the plan, free prescriptions would be available only to children, the over-60s, pregnant women and people on income support or jobseeker’s allowance. Students would also receive free prescriptions – but only until the age of 19.

Davidson did not specify a fee, although reports suggest she would opt to reintroduce the £6.85 prescription cost that was in place in 2007. Such a charge would affect around half the population.  In England, the fee is due to rise from £7.85 to £8.05 on 1 April, while prescriptions are currently free in Wales and Northern Ireland.

She went on to draw parallels between the SNP’s time in government and the fluctuating quantity of nurses and midwives.  “Under the SNP, the number of nurses and midwives in Scotland has gone up and down like a fiddler’s elbow,” said Davidson.

She added: “Millions are spent on bank or agency nurses to plug the gaps – it’s not good enough for staff and it’s not good enough for patients.

“That’s why today I am able to announce that the Scottish Conservatives will pledge an extra 1,000 nurses and midwives for Scotland and, once introduced, we will not let numbers drop below that mark.”

Health Secretary Alex Neil has already hit out at the policy. The MSP for Airdrie and Shotts called into question both the overall premise of the pledge and the implication that it is a choice between prescription charges or more nursing jobs.

“It is not a case of funding either prescriptions or nurses.  In Scotland’s NHS we can and will provide free prescriptions, pay our NHS staff a fair wage and protect an NHS free at the point of need,” said Neil. “Prescription charges were a tax on ill health.  They prevent people getting the medication they need, damage their ability to work and can lead to an increase in the workload for hospitals, nurses and GPs.”

John Curtice, professor of politics at Strathclyde University and one of the most active commentators on the independence debate, queried the ideas set out in Davidson’s speech.

“It was a vision which cuts across what many people regard as being the dominant narrative in Scotland – the idea of Scotland being a more social democratic country and wanting more equality,” said Professor Curtice. “But she [Davidson] was saying: ‘no, I believe in choice in public services, lower taxation and welfare reform’.

“There was something rather funny about that because – if that was her dominant message – why then was the one and only policy promise made in the speech actually a promise to reintroduce a tax: the prescription tax?”

Comments  

 
#
NkosiEcosse
2014-03-16 17:51

Guess she will become a non entity after 2015
 
 
#
John Souter
2014-03-16 19:50

Typical Tories – put a price on everything and value nothing other than their own self interests.

For the Tories to be the dominant party in Scotland its population would have to fall to 5,000.
 
 
#
Jamie Black
2014-03-17 21:56

Typical SNP supporter – support all the vote winning ideas with no plans on how to actually pay for it. Whoopee!
 

 
#
bringiton
2014-03-16 20:11

The Tories in Scotland can promise anything because they know they will never be in a position to deliver it.
There is also the small matter of our referendum which will completely change the political landscape in Scotland making these promises even more vacuous than normal.
If the unionist politicians in Scotland wish to be re-elected in 2016 they are going to have to ditch the Anglo baggage and start talking up Scotland’s prospects rather than denigrating them as at present.
This means new political parties whose allegiance is to the people of Scotland and not the whips in London and policies which reflect that new reality.
At present,politic  al manifestos are based on an economic model designed for Anglo requirements but after 2016 that will no longer be the case.
Yesterdays people proposing yesterdays solutions.
 
 
#
Breeks
2014-03-16 20:50

“Echoing her speech at the party conference two years ago”…

In fairness that wasn’t her, but the largely empty auditorium.
 
 
#
martin morrison
2014-03-17 15:09

Plain daft, too. One of the main arguments for abolishing prescription charges was that they cost too much to administer.

I’ll give them this, though: at least they are honest. Their timing was probably flawed – in the same way as the sea is probably wet. If they’d had any sense they’d have sat on this one a while. In one fell swoop, they’ve managed to anger the greatest number of people imaginable. Quite a trick, even for the Tories. Oh well.
 
 
#
weegie38
2014-03-17 17:21

I doubt it can be quantified, but I’m sure having free prescriptions means you don’t need as many nurses.
By eliminating the financial barrier to medication, I’m sure the numbers of hospital visits required by people are reduced substantially.
 

You must be logged-in in order to post a comment.