By a Newsnet reporter
The BBC has claimed that it doesn’t have to present viewers and listeners with a balanced view of the independence debate.
Newsnet Scotland can reveal that in an extraordinary email, a licence payer who had complained about imbalance in a recent radio debate was told “…we are not in an official referendum campaign and therefore do not have to balance it out between yes and no.”
The complaint followed a broadcast of the Brian Taylor’s Big Debate Radio programme that saw three pro-Union panellists debate the referendum with one SNP MSP.
Labour MP Mike Connarty, Conservative businessman Iain McGill and journalist Hamish Macdonell were pitched against SNP MSP Angela Constance as they debated topics that included the independence referendum.
The complaint resulted in the BBC insisting that the official referendum campaign had not yet started and therefore they were not obliged to ensure an equal representation of pro-independence guests to pro-Union guests whenever independence was discussed.
In the official response, a BBC official wrote: “Brian’s debate is a general programme which discusses a number of subjects every week and the programme brings a range of voices to those subjects. In addition, we are not in an official referendum campaign and therefore do not have to balance it out between yes and no.”
On Saturday, Newsnet Scotland contacted BBC Scotland press office asking for a response to the claim, but as yet we have received no reply.
The extraordinary statement follows concerns over the quality of debate being provided by broadcasters, with the BBC coming in for significant criticism.
A recent appearance in front of Holyrood’s Culture Committee saw BBC Scotland Chiefs defend the broadcaster’s output in Scotland amid fears that job cuts would hit the referendum coverage. The BBC is facing widespread industrial action if management insist on going ahead with compulsory redundancies in Scotland.
The committee members have since put further questions to BBC Scotland bosses relating to staff morale, staff cuts, quality and Commonwealth Games funding.
MEANWHILE, organisers of a public rally calling for balance from broadcasters in their coverage of the referendum debate have announced the official location and schedule for the event.
Entitled ‘Illuminate The Debate’ the event will see participants assemble on Saturday Feb 23rd at Strathclyde University at 10:00am in readiness for a 10:30am march which will take a route past George Square to the destination at St Enoch’s Square.
An organiser told Newsnet Scotland that the rally was not intended to promote any side in the independence debate but was a simple call for balanced and honest coverage from the BBC and STV.
The spokesman said: “We have probably less than 20 months to go before the nation makes the biggest decision in over 300 years.
“Sadly, aside from STV’s Scotland Tonight programme there has been little sign that our broadcasters are interested in using this historic moment in order to illuminate what has been tagged ‘the great debate’.
“Those programmes that are broadcast are dominated by the same political parties and mostly male pundits, with little regard for balance.”
Commenting on the BBC’s claim that debates do not have to be balanced because the campaign has yet to officially begin, the spokesman added:
“This statement highlights the need for the public to start demanding that the BBC live up to its reputation. Scotland pays £325 million in licence fees and only £100 million is spent here.”
Calling for people to come along to the rally, he added: “If we don’t highlight this broadcasting deficit then we may well find we have missed the chance to educate the electorate – something that future generations will find unforgiveable.”
Quote:
Please inform everyone of this event, webpage to follow www.bard2014.com that’s Balanced, All inclusive, Referendum, Debate. All we can ask for from our media. This event is IMPARTIAL and relates to both quality and equality.
Hope to see as many of you there as possible.
Please spread the word, this is the start of a campaign to engage the public and let them see just how impartial our media really is!
The official Yes and No organisations have both formally launched their campaigns.
The BBC then ‘should’ give representative weight to different parties. As we know, even that is totally abused and dominated by Labour and Tories. So still expect at least a 3:1 representation of No to Yes just before the referendum across BBC broadcasts.
What they will do is balance representation on talk and question shows/emissions, but nothing else.
I wish they would just come out and state “Our remit is to keep the UK together, this is what we are doing”.
[Organisers have politely asked that the rally centre on a request for balance.]
Ipsos-Mori poll on Scottish Independence, the changes are from their last poll in October.
Should Scotland be an independent country?
Yes 34% (+4)
No 55% (-3)
Undecided 11% (-1)
On the ratings on how some of the politicians are viewed in Scotland, will also give comfort to the SNP and supporters for Independence.
Satisfied/Dissatisfied
Alex Salmond 50/43, net rating of plus 7
David Cameron 27/67, net rating of minus 40
Nicola Sturgeon 50/33, net rating of plus 17
Alastair Darling 33/32, net rating of plus 1.
There was more good news for the SNP in the poll when it comes to asking voters how they would use their first vote if there was a Holyrood election tomorrow (again changes from the last Mori poll in October)
SNP 43% (+3)
Labour 35% (-)
Conservatives 13% (-)
Liberal Democrats 7% (-1)
Others 2% (-2)
Ms Sturgeon is easily outscoring Alistair Darling, the head of the pro-Union Better Together campaign, when it comes to voter satisfaction.
But perhaps even more concerning for Mr Darling and Better Together is that more than one in three Scots (35 per cent) says they have no opinion on Mr Darling’s performance, a possible pointer to a perceived lack of impact on the part of the former Labour Chancellor.
With five months to go until the Scottish Parliament elections, Labour has increased its lead over the SNP to 10 points in the latest poll from Ipsos MORI Scotland.
Mark Diffley, Research Director at Ipsos MORI said:
“As the Holyrood election looms ever closer, Labour has opened up a substantial lead in our latest poll. This represents a gradual shift in fortunes in the past 12 months which has seen the Labour’s share of the vote increase from 32% to 41% since November 2009, while the SNP’s share has fallen 36% to 31% over the same period. Labour also seems to be the main beneficiary from a fall in the popularity of the Liberal Democrats, who now stand at 11%, while the Conservatives stand at 13%.”
Who said polls in Scotland are designed to influence opinion?
Make no mistake, the public charter of the bbc does not give them the choice when to be ‘balanced’, not with OUR money.
Well, well.
it has hundreds of promises to provide listeners & viewers with fair and balanced standards in ALL it’s broadcasts.
It has been a very poor month for Unionist broadcasters with accusations of “misconstruing” foreign dignitary’s agreement with legal opinion for YesScotland, the PrimeMinister’s campaign hiring an expert that stated support for Scot’s independence (although Unionists appear to have either failed to read the report or understand it’s meaning), repeated accusations of breaches of the Offensive Communications Act as Scotland &Eire; suffered multiple insults & abuses on BBCQT editing, and the BBC’s hilarity at a cartoon requesting Scotland to go and get Fu**ed, then came the misspeak that Scotland (or North Britain) was secretly assimilated as a region of greater England in 1707.
Does anyone know what the likely outcome would be, if I said when taken to court for not having a TV license, that I’m not paying it on political grounds due to BBC bias which they have even admitted themselves ?
Yes, heard that and they have an article on the website now:
“Scottish independence: Word ‘separate’ banned by Commons”
“A row has broken out at Westminster after parliamentary authorities banned the use of the word “separate” in a Commons debate on independence.
The move by House of Commons clerks in the wake of SNP protests prompted Labour to cancel a debate on the future of Royal Mail in Scotland.”
I think the upshot of this is that the labour party are about to tell us that we can’t afford a state mail system without westminster subsidy, being the subsidy junkies that we in the something for nothing English region are!
To debate (a separate Scotland mail service) would be to provide information about what things would / could look like in Scotland after independence, this is a no no!
AND
(wait for this) any debate must have a ‘neutral’ heading / title.
Are you listening BBC!
——————————
Apparently it’s the jam tomorrow thing.
Vote NO and then we will tell you what the pig in the poke is.
Surprise! surprise! please don’t get fooled again
It is therefore ironic that with the recent revelation that Scotland is just a region of Greater England (yeah right!), they should choose to bar the usage now.
Or – conspiracy hat on – could this be seen as an attempt to re-bottle that genie by the UK government?
No Change There Then!
Nor will there be unless we support the planned March and Rally in our thousands.
VOTE YES in 2014
Since there is no difference in policies between all three Unionist Parties in Holyrood, they should not have three spokespersons in any debate or political programme? The solution is quite simple. Put them on a rota..
Think your on to something there, Cuckoo, it’s always 3 Unionista’s against 1 YES voter – it should b the other way round, 3 YES versus 1 trougher;-)))
Signed the petition but concerned the wording doesn’t cover the 18 months between now and the run-up to the referendum. The BBC claims this is why it doesn’t have to provide a balanced panel on QT. So what’s the answer, or is there some devil in the detail of Ofcom referendum regulations which would cover this situation?
That is why complaints to the BBC are fobbed off with disdain and why they can operate with impunity free from Freedom Information legislation and any other scrutiny that could expose their close links with Whitehall’s spooks who routinely plant stories via the BBC and MSM “in defence of the state”.
The sooner Scots wake up to this the sooner we will have a fair fight on our hands.
I really did think my ears were deceiving me but it was only the trailer for Scottish news – I gave up watching BBBC news a while back.Thinking of doing the same with STV since Lennon appears to take the most regular slot.
I’m not talking about hiring lawyers here, let them take me to court for refusing to pay the BBC for the privilege of biased one sided political content which they have admitted themselves, this at a time when our people will have to make the biggest decision ever faced by our citizens, it’s not the biggest decision in 300 years, we didn’t have a choice then. It’s the biggest decision ever.
The BBC is supposed to be fair and balanced at all times so with them admitting they are not I would surely have a valid case.
You can read my complaint here bbc.scotlandshire.co.uk/…/…
This comment box isn’t big enough to send the response I got, but I can forward it to anyone who wants it.
craig@silicongl en.com
thanks