By a Newsnet reporter
It’s hardly a surprise to find that the British Broadcasting machine’s Scottish outpost has kicked into full war mode when the future of the United Kingdom is under threat, this after all is what state broadcasters do.
The first ‘law’ of broadcasting during any war is to provide as much ‘news’ as possible to ensure the man (or woman) in the street keeps faith with your side.
Downplay your opponents gains and exaggerate your own is the rule.
The war of course is the independence referendum, the WMDs (weapons of mass distraction) are words and the foot soldiers are the ‘reporters’ of BBC Scotland – well some of them.
The publication of the report that details Scotland’s fiscal health has confirmed that Scotland is subsidising the UK. There’s really no other way to portray the figures contained in GERS.
Well, not unless you are BBC Scotland who yesterday provided yet more evidence to the growing list of incriminatory episodes that are fast leading to the conclusion that there is a corrupt element at Pacific Quay.
In the introduction to last night’s News at Ten, Jackie Bird trailed the Scottish slot with the following statement: “The official figures that show how much Scotland relies on oil money to pay the bills if it became an independent country”
Scotland apparently produces nothing at all – save for some oil and gas near our shores that is volatile and running out, it’ll be gone the day after we vote for independence.
The late night introduction ended a particularly bruising and brutal day for those of us who longed for the days of honest journalism. It began with a carefully contrived ‘leak’ of a document that set the tone for how BBC Scotland would approach the release of official figures that demonstrated the relative wealth of those Scots who pay their wages.
The leaked document was timed to deflect attention from the GERS report, as was the ‘downgrading’ of the Scottish economy by the Fraser of Allander Institute, the Mystic Meg of economic forecasters.
In any war, the propaganda vehicle must diminish the ‘gains’ of the enemy whilst embellishing positive news for its own side. Thus, BBC Scotland’s role yesterday wasn’t to report on the GERS report in a factual manner, it was to diminish the effectiveness of the figures and blunt what was certain to be a considerable boost for the Yes campaign.
The Reporting Scotland tea-time news item witnessed former Herald Political Editor Douglas Fraser dispense with any pretence of journalistic integrity as he sought to turn good news about his own nation into bad.
The introduction from Jackie Bird was always expected “Can we afford independence? … the Government are spending a lot more than Scots are paying in tax”.
Fraser’s job as the Business and Economy Editor ought to have been restricted to the report itself and an explanation of the figures. Indeed it is acceptable to highlight the deficit if it is clearly explained that this is the norm for countries and that Scotland’s deficit as a proportion of GDP is a sign of rude good health.
But alas what we got was a mixture of the BBC ‘leak’ and a prediction of doom from a think tank that has well documented links to the Labour party. The mixing of three different subjects allowed Fraser to dilute the effectiveness of the GERS figures and introduce all kinds of politically motivated rhetoric. Good news thus sounded bad when all three were mixed and conflated.
Douglas Fraser on Reporting Scotland
Embed Embed this video on your site
It’s worth pausing to look at the downgrading of its forecast of Scotland’s economic performance by the Fraser of Allander Institute – deemed of such importance by the ‘Fraser of BBC’ that it was included along with the GERS figures (well some of them). In November last year, this same think tank – headed by one Professor Brian Ashcroft – downgraded its prediction for the Scottish economy insisting it would shrink in 2012. In fact the Scottish economy grew by 0.4% in 2012.
Also popping up later that evening on Newsnight Scotland just in time to pour cold water on any thoughts that Scotland would be better off unshackled from Westminster was the CPPR in the form of Jo Armstrong – another think tank with links to the Labour party. The same key words, “oil” – “volatility” – “rapidly depleting” that marks out the Unionist mindset were all there.
Finishing off the trio was the OBR – a think tank created by UK Chancellor George Osborne – and another forecast of oil doomdom. When facts harm your argument then predictions from three Unionist leaning think tanks come rapidly to your aid.
This is Unionism and journalism meeting head on and the desperate day ended with Gordon Brewer confronting Derek Mackay with headlines from pro-Union newspapers who were claiming another ‘leaked’ report showed the SNP were planning cuts to welfare in an independent Scotland. Such reports and articles are routine whenever a big story emerges that damages the case for the Union.
The sham was complete when Brewer cut off Mackay’s response which sought to highlight the McCrone report – the biggest scandal of all and one that remains under-reported.
How Newsnight Scotland covered the GERS report
Embed Embed this video on your site
The days careful reporting of the GERS report by BBC Scotland was shocking, even by Pacific Quay’s standards and is a signal of intent from the station.
It followed news that yet another Foreign Minister had claimed comments made by his office relating to Scottish independence had been misrepresented by the broacaster.
The alleged culprit was Glenn Campbell who had reported Luxembourg as apparently “warning” against independence.
Campbell’s track record in the handling of politically sensitive issues is less than boastful and his ability to allow his political leanings to infect his news reports and interviews is legendary. Indeed this morning on Good Morning Scotland he popped up again covering the headlines promoted by Brewer the previous evening and astonishingly refused to confirm if the leaked report actually contained the cuts claimed by the Unionists.
BBC Scotland refused to change when Scotland embraced devolution, they are even further behind as the nation moves forward again and gears up for the 2014 referendum.
What we are witnessing now is a self-policing broadcasting machine that has morphed into a colonial broadcaster unable to check itself. Unionism is eating away at its soul and a lack of accountability is allowing a minority to indulge their prejudices.
The aforementioned presenters – it’s becoming increasingly difficult to call them journalists – probably aren’t aware just how obvious their behaviour has become, they are too close to the problem.
Not all at BBC Scotland are this journalistically corrupt – is there any other phrase to describe what’s going on? – but those who display these tendencies are allowed a significantly higher profile than those who genuinely do report in a professional and non-partisan manner.
It’s probably why people like Derek Bateman and Isobel Fraser are consigned to weekend morning slots where their excellent journalism will have minimal impact.
Their reputations are being sullied – they, and a great many others, are being tainted by a hard core minority. The Catholic Church in Scotland is evidence of just how a few rotten eggs can taint a whole institution if no-one acts to curtail inappropriate behaviour.
The independence referendum is too important an issue for the good and honest to remain silent, they really must speak out.
It is dated Jan 14th 1999
It gives various scenarios based on the price of oil..
including a ‘relatively optimistic figure of $14!
The idea that an independent Scotland could balance its books with the revenues from North Sea oil has been disproved by new research
Your article shows nothing has changed except the price of a barrel of oil…
…$111.04
Holyrood MUST act – as long as the government does nothing to challenge the continuous bias output, and the non-reporting of what is actually happening we are actually in danger of losing the referendum at the hands of the BBC.
It will be no use coming back after the referendum and saying we should have…
There are of course dangers in challenging them, but on balance, to let them continue in the manner they are at present is a much bigger danger.
It’s very worring.
It looks like they are seeing what they can get away with and taunting the SNP to complain.
It is working at the moment because people as a rule trust the BBC.
Might be worth going along to their next strike and quizzing the journalists on the subject.
I know it is a long game but this propaganda machine is worrying.
Sorry but where is your evidence for that? Just because the BBC hold the megaphone doesn’t mean that its enforced audience agrees with every bit of propaganda they produce.
Look at how much Newsnet has raised in a week. The average punter is seeing through the “mass distraction”. Look at any BTL discussion on independence. The overwhelming strength of reasoned articulate opinion is on the side of independence or at least agnostic about it.
BBC Scotland news output is produced by a steadily decreasing band of under-resourced badly demoralised journalists and it really shows. It’s influence on public opinion is becoming marginal.
Excellent job NNS in showing up just how poor the quality of BBC journalism is.
Don’t under estimate the wave of ridiculous assertions still to come when we’re in the midst of the referendum campaign itself. It’s about time the Scottish Government took a lead on this to at least try and curb BBC Scotland stupidity or we will already have lost the referendum before it has officially begun.
The Scottish Government will not win the ‘Don’t knows?’. Margo Macdonald made the point that the Scottish government should be picking their fights, I agree.
There is a police team due to visit Libya to seek “evidence” of Megrahi’s involvement in the Pan-Am bombing.
It would suit all the british establishment to “find” this incriminating evidence.
In spite of the all the evidence that has come to light since the “trial” (what a farce that was!) of Megrahi that points to him having little or no involvement in the bombing I’m sure our boys in blue will manage to find evidence that will exonerate all of the guilty. The guilty include westminster, the courts, the police, MI5, MI6, the CIA and the American government.
With regard to the bbc – the behavior of the Haw Haw Bird and Private Fraser is only to be expected. They are fighting for the survival of their beloved britain.
BTW, if an independent country is not viable if it runs a budget deficit, then how do you explain the phrase “Better Together”? Since the UK’s structural deficit is proportionately larger than Scotland’s, surely that should be “Worse Off Together”? Doesn’t make sense, does it?
And how are oil prices going to be less volatile if Scotland remains part of the UK – do “Better Together” have some magic, oil price fixing ability?
In paragraph 16, there is talk of the FoAI’s prediction that Scotland’s economy will shrink in 2013, then the point is made that “(i)n fact the Scottish economy grew by 0.4% in 2013.” Since we’ve only had two month of 2013, I think it is wise to perhaps check whether you should be talking about 2012 rather than 2013.
If NNS is critiquing the behaviour of the BBC, basic factual errors need to be eliminated in order not to weaken the case you are making.
With regards to the BBC, I agree that it’s a matter for the Scottish Government to address. I won’t be satisfied with anything less than an independent Scottish digital news channel. That will take time to set up, but it feels like the entirely correct thing to do, but the process needs to be starting.
Don’t waste your time complaining to the BBC trust, the complaint process is designed to keep complaints disjointed and uncoordinated. Lobby our Scottish Government, because this is a big deal.
I have faith in the Scottish people’s power to know lies from the BBC, but it’s healthier for the debate if the BBC’s monopoly was downgraded and its input less relevant.
It’s a pity that they didn’t balance the article with the *real* data.
Examples: Savile is being “disappeared” from the news; “Fernbridge” has never been mentioned.
Similarly, in Scotland, there is always a panda or a walrus to be discussed. Any suggestion that independence could be good for Scotland is to be witheld or buried.
Quote:
LONDON–Oil prices could rise to anywhere between $150 and $270 a barrel by 2020 as demand growth in emerging markets like India and China out paces expected supply, the OECD said Wednesday.
In the weeks leading up to the vote, we will see this every day for days, if not weeks. You will have rigged polls, you will have false reporting, you will have all the dirty tricks. The only goal for the BBC is to win the referendum – no matter the consequences.
Do we think we are strong enough to battle through this by generally ignoring them, or do we take on the BBC now ?
I’ll not pre-empt this, as I might be accused of scaremongering. This would maybe bring the debate about this report slightly more on track than yet another rant about the BBC.
What an embarrassment for the BBC. If their mendaciousness weren’t enough, they can’t even spell deficit.
Exactly if they can’t get that right what can they get right. When I saw that photo of Fraser standing in front of the screen another word beginning with defec*** came to mind, although admittedly in the more commonly known shortened version.
If the people who organised the marches against BBC bias really want to be effective they should seriously consider organising a mass opt out of paying the BBC TV licence fee. That would generate wide publicity and seriously concentrate minds at BBC HQ. And if enough people did it there is nothing the authorities could do.
I agree.
I stopped paying over a year ago and apart from letters that go in the bin I have’t had any hassle from the authorities.
My neighbour who doesn’t pay either got a visit before Christmas and told them to where to go and has heard nothing since.
Why pay good money for this abysmal, biased service?
It smacks of desperation as they’re terrified Scotland becomes independent. The more afraid they become, the bigger the lies will be.
I hope the general public will become sick and tired of all this nay-saying. The Scottish Government and Yes Scotland will soon pull out all the stops and hopefully convince people of the mainstream media’s deceit.
Meanwhile, it’s up to us to make a determined effort to convert the don’t knows into yes voters.
What they fail to realise is that many people now use the internet to get the real facts, and that you can only fool the public for so long.
Quote:
Because frankly, the scare stories are wearing a bit thin.
The latest is over a leaked SNP document that’s cue for a doom-laden warning about slashing pensions, cutting defence spending and shedding public sector jobs.
Strip away the hysteria and what you actually have is a sensible Government prepared to make sensible decisions about spending.
But people being people, some of them will have long memories, and will remember the ones that were actively involved in the media to boost the no vote by telling the public half truths, out right lies, and generally giving false propaganda about the yes movement efforts for an independent Scotland.
After independence, the BBC will no doubt, be overhauled and made different to suit Scotland’s needs and requirements. I only hope that some of them who are now employed with that organisation will have some other kind of employable training or useful skills, so that they can earn a living to provide for themselves in the future.
Sadly they are overpaid by the majority of us.
I find it quite unbelieveable that they can sit there arrogantly undermining Scots and Scotland with absurd reports ,faux outrage and inaccurate comment.
Should we vote for independence I vote we close the whole shebang and those interested in an impartial Scottish broadcaster have to apply via audition and interview.
I am mindful of the talented young from the erstwhile RSAMDA (Conservatoire kinda sticks in my throat!)many of whom would enjoy presenting,acti ng ,directing and working on the technical side in a newly formed national broadcaster.
btw What was Lamentable on about with her reference to squirrels.
Is she a grey squirrell?
The Unionist ‘rent-a-panic’ reaction was priceless. “Yada! Yada! Err, I want to change the subject!”
What’s wrong Mr Brewer? Was it the BBC or Labour who briefed you to avoid any mention of the McCrone Report?
As I posted elsewhere – read it and weep, not for the future but for the last forty wasted years throwing a nations wealth into the sink-hole of Westminster.
Para 27 From 2017 -18 onwards public spending is therefore expected to grow in line with the economy. This would imply real terms growth in Scottish public spending of between 1,4% and 2% a year. There will therefore be some opportunities to provide additional resources in priority areas. However there are also inherent real terms cost pressures within public sector budgets. One of these – debt repayments – I have already set out. There is also likely to be an increase in the real terms cost of providing existing public services in Scotland after 2016-17. We will need to be mindful that these pressures could reduce the resources available to provide additional public services.
The real conclusions in the leaked document which were grossly mis reported by the Unionist Press and British State Broadcaster.
Financial overview – conclusions
Para 26.
The forward projections of the likely overall fiscal envelope provide a challenging context.
However by 2016-17 the Scottish public finances are expected to have returned to a sustainable position with tax receipts broadly matching public expenditure and public sector net debt slowly declining as a share of GDP.
How could any journalist with an ounce of integrity can interpret this into the negative Daily Express, Daily Mail, Times, BBC headlines is beyond me.
Note 1. Scotland will become independent in 2016.
Note 2. Since publication of this report, Oil and Gas revenues are now predicted to increase over the next few years hence huge recent investment.
As stated at FMQs Scotland spends 38% of revenues on social provision whereas the UK needs to spend a higher 42.3% of revenues on social provision.
It covers the BBC & yesterdays GDP along with the altered maritime boundaries carried out by the Labour party in 1999.
Perhaps Newsnet Scotland could ask permission to publish it here?
“Propaganda against Scotland”
“”Oil production should revive from recent levels for a period of several years, particularly with the higher-price scenario, where the increase could be substantial,” the study by Alexander Kemp and Linda Stephen [of the University of Aberdeen] concluded.” (Reuters, 5th December 2012)
“Oil & Gas UK reckons oil receipts will be £3bn higher in 2017 than forecast last year. While Brent crude prices are now around $110 per barrel, by 2017, the UK’s Department of Energy and Climate Change predicts they could hit $130 a barrel, while the latest OECD predictions put them higher, at an eye-watering, record $150 a barrel.” (The Guardian, 7th March 2013)
“Oil prices could rise to anywhere between $150 and $270 a barrel by 2020 as demand growth in emerging markets like India and China outpaces expected supply, the OECD said Wednesday.
We’ve resolved to deliver leaflets every month to each home in our area with a family of volunteers.
Initially we use the YES leaflets but we are preparing ones for the local area to localise the benefits of Independence to our communities
Source Telegraph March 2011 (my eboldening)
“The OBR forecasts oil prices to peak this year at $113 a barrel, but to remain at $107 or above through to the end of 2015.[currently Mar 2013 – $115 per barrel] …
…But, Mr Nickell added: “Forecasting oil prices, as anyone knows, is a mug’s game.”
Note no significant oil price drop predicted by the OBR through to 2015.
In actuality prices have gone up and industry forecasts (see last post) are for a further increase.
Also note a virtual admission that they do not know what they are talking about
Westminster ministers talk up the UK’s future oil revenue to external bodies it is only Scotland that gets the U-certificate censored version.
Another scam from the BBC
Propaganda against Scotland
by craig on March 7, 2013 10:28 am in Uncategorized
Part 1
A particularly sickening trick from the BBC a few weeks back raised my blood pressure whilst in hospital and almost finished me off. A French Euro MP was asked for “the French view” on Scottish independence. She said that France would oppose it and the French government takes the view that an independent Scotland would be outside the European Union. I was absolutely astonished that the BBC had managed to find the only French person in the entire world who is against Scottish independence, and that she was telling an outright lie about the position of the French government.
Then I realised who she was – the former research assistant (and rather more) of New Labour minister and criminal invoice forger Denis Macshane. She worked for years in the UK parliament for New Labour, in a Monica Lewinsky kind of way. All of which the BBC hid, presenting her simply as a French Euro MP. There are seventy million French people. How remarkable that the one the BBC chose to give the French view of Scottish independence was a New Labour hack!
Scottish education ‘falling behind’ other countries
I looked up the Commission on School Reform –
In November 2011 the think tanks Reform Scotland and the Centre for Scottish Public Policy set up the Commission on School Reform to consider whether the school system in Scotland is meeting the present and future needs of young people and to try and reach a consensus about specific recommendations on areas for improvement or that require further enquiry.
The Commission was chaired by Keir Bloomer and published its final report, ‘By Diverse Meanse: Improving Scottish Education’, on 4 March 2013.
Who are they and what is their objective?
BBC in Scotland is becoming a law unto itself.
Vote AYE!
Keep it up AS that was top class !!
What a fantastic performance for Alex Salmond yesterday at FMQ’s, he ripped into the bitter together mob and even Westminster got some too, I think we need more of this from AS, he was on top form and the predictions for the North Sea totally blew apart the unionist scam on the people of Scotland that the oil is running out.
Keep it up AS that was top class !!
The BBC still managed to report on FMQ’s as; “The Opposition Party’s Mount A United Attack On Salmond and Scotland’s Ability To Afford Independence.”
—–“Yesterday’s coverage of the official, civil service prepared GERS report indicating that Scotland subsidises the rest of the UK’s public finances brought these matters to a head.”
A MUST READ,and please spread it on by Twitter/Facebook.
To quote some more from Craig Murray:
Action must be taken now. That necessary and urgent action is for Alex Salmond and the Government of Scotland to approach the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and request that the subordinate Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR, pronounced Oh Dear!) deploy immediately an election monitoring mission to cover the referendum.